Jakarta (ANTARA) - The direction of Red and White Village Cooperatives is becoming clearer as an initiative to push village economic transformation.

The goal is not only to strengthen the grassroots economy through cooperatives but also to integrate various policy instruments into a single program.

These instruments include job creation through the recruitment of 30,000 cooperative managers, financial support from the state budget, and the empowerment of impoverished families within the Family Hope Program (PKH) by involving them as cooperative members or even employees.

For the 30,000 cooperative manager positions, the government has opened the recruitment registration on April 15–24, 2026.

The selected candidates will be employed by the state-owned enterprise PT Agrinas Pangan Nusantara under a two-year fixed-term contract.

Under this arrangement, during the first two years of operations, the village cooperatives will be managed by these Agrinas-recruited professionals. This approach is intended to ensure the cooperatives operate with modern and professional standards before full management is eventually handed over to the cooperative boards.

In addition, the government has confirmed it will involve PKH beneficiaries, encouraging them to join as cooperative members or employees. The hope is that they can get additional income and escape poverty.

This approach reflects the government's efforts to drive integrated economic transformation in villages through cooperatives.

However, as more functions are bundled into a single program, the demands on the supporting ecosystem grow significantly.

Consequently, the primary challenge shifted from policy design to the actual execution at the village level.



Job creation

One of the aspects that receives public attention in the village cooperative program is job creation.

The recruitment of 30,000 cooperative managers creates significant opportunities for educated workers, including fresh graduates who have long faced challenges in securing formal employment.

A researcher at the Center of Reform on Economics (CORE) Indonesia, Yusuf Rendy Manilet, noted that in the short term, this job creation could yield positive results by boosting income and consumption in villages.

However, cooperative management—which includes business operations, financial management, and market expansion—demands a high level of expertise.

Given the relatively general recruitment criteria, there is a potential gap between the skill sets of those recruited and the complexity of the tasks they will face.

The successful placement of managers also highly depends on the clarity of the standard operating procedure (SOP) and measurable work indicators.

Deputy Chair of the Indonesian Chamber of Commerce and Industry (Kadin) for Cooperatives, Agung Sujatmiko, added that the government needs to ensure detailed guidelines on the tasks, functions, and roles of managers in every cooperative, including their status and position within the institutional structure.

This clarity is essential because these managers do more than handle daily operations; they carry a government mandate to strengthen cooperative institutions at the village level.

Without clear boundaries, there is a risk of overlapping functions and weakened accountability.

Furthermore, performance indicators must be designed to measure their actual contribution to cooperative development.

The manager’s role goes beyond administration; they must also turn the cooperative into an aggregator and consolidator of the village economy. This requires them to have the capacity to innovate in developing local potential, including processing commodities into value-added products, and building distribution systems that reach broader markets.

Additionally, transparency in recruitment and placement schemes is a critical factor in minimizing the potential for conflict at the village level.

One of the fundamental issues is the source of the workforce: specifically, whether positions will be filled by local residents or outside hires.

In the case of the latter, disparities in backgrounds may hinder work effectiveness, particularly regarding the understanding of local sociocultural dynamics.

The placement of workers from outside the village may face adaptation challenges and require time to gain social acceptance. A lack of understanding regarding the local context could also hinder coordination with village stakeholders, including the village government, thereby affecting the overall harmony of the program's implementation.

Furthermore, this situation could spark tensions, particularly if there are unemployed residents in the area. The government must avoid any perception of unfairness in the recruitment process, as this could negatively impact community participation in the cooperatives.

However, recruiting local residents is not without its own challenges.

Sujatmiko noted that social proximity does not always translate to better performance, innovation, or professionalism in managing a cooperative.

Without capacity building and a clear evaluation system, the manager's role will be at risk of not being optimal. As a result, the program risks shifting from a rural economic development initiative into a mere short-term labor absorption scheme.

On the other hand, integrating PKH beneficiaries as cooperative members opens new avenues for community empowerment. This scheme is expected to transform their role from passive aid recipients into active participants in the village economy.

The government targets the Red and White Village Cooperatives to employ up to 1.4 million workers from the pool of PKH beneficiaries.

While the target creates new hope for villages, the success not only depends on the number of recruited workers but also on the readiness of the ecosystems in villages to support the cooperatives' operations.



Safeguarding the cooperative principles

Another challenge emerges from the institutional aspect, namely, how to ensure the cooperatives can be integrated with the existing ecosystems in villages.

Economic activity in villages has long been driven by local players, such as traders, small shop owners, and distribution agents. Meanwhile, these state-facilitated cooperatives could potentially enter those same business lines.

Therefore, Red and White Village Cooperatives must be geared toward creating value through aggregation, consolidation, and expanding market access, rather than simply becoming a new competitor.

Furthermore, the primary challenge lies in ensuring that these cooperatives continue to operate according to the core principle of being member-based organizations, despite receiving full government support.

Cooperatives must be built on a foundation of participation, self-reliance, and collective ownership.

Without active participation, these entities risk becoming nothing more than a place to shop. If the community is positioned merely as consumers of their products, cooperatives lose their essence as member-based organizations.

In such a scenario, village cooperatives could be perceived as little more than an extension of government programs. This dependency leaves these cooperatives vulnerable to policy changes or shifts in government priorities.

This vulnerability becomes even more apparent given the financing schemes tied to the program.

The government has issued the Minister of Finance Regulation Number 15 of 2026, which regulates the financing of Red and White Village Cooperatives using the state budget.

This scheme enables financing for physical construction and cooperative needs, as well as the placement of funds as a source of liquidity for state-owned banks. Financing of up to Rp3 billion (approximately US$172,740) per unit is provided, with a tenure of up to 72 months and a grace period of 6 to 12 months.

Installment payments are managed through regional transfer mechanisms—via either General Allocation Funds, Revenue Sharing Funds, or Village Funds—thereby easing the burden at the cooperative level.

In this context, the role of managers becomes more critical. They will serve not only as operational executors but also as business unit managers that must maintain a balance between business operations and financial health.

At the end of the day, the success of the Red and White Village Cooperatives is highly determined by the ability to maintain a balance between government intervention and the strengthening of core cooperative principles.

While interventions could be given to fast-track the program, long-term sustainability remains dependent on community participation and self-reliance.

Strengthening human resource capacity, upholding core cooperative principles, and integrating with existing local businesses are essential prerequisites for the program to deliver more than just a short-term impact.

Without these foundational elements, the Red and White Village Cooperatives risk failing to transform the rural economy and could ultimately end up as nothing more than cooperatives in name only.



Related news: Indonesia to build 25,000 Red and White Cooperatives by July

Related news: Indonesia introduces call center for public cooperative queries