Donald Kessler, an astrophysicist at NASA's Environmental Effects Office, said the space industry has been slowly developing ideas for over 30 years on how to proceed to clean up space junk, but none has ever been fully tested.
Space debris comes from asteroids, comets, meteorites and also defunct man-made space devices or their parts. "Dead" satellites are an example of space debris, which poses increasing risks to functional satellites and the International Space Station.
Kessler, the first chief of NASA's Orbital Debris Program Office, said there are three fundamental issues to be resolved in relation to the cleaning up of space junk.
"One, how do we get to the objects inexpensively? Two, how do we grab an object that is likely spinning and not designed to be grabbed? Three, what do we do with the object after grabbing it?" Kessler told Xinhua.
Another fact to consider is that astrophysicists and scientists have been slow to address the topic. To cite but one case, NASA does not annually spend any government funds with regard to the research and the cleaning up of space junk.
Size of space debris can be as small as one centimeter. Astrophysicists and scientists have difficulty putting precise definitions to "large" space debris. However, usually an object of 10 centimeters or greater is considered "large."
International interest in cleaning up space debris has increased in recent years, especially since February 2009, when two artificial satellites collided at almost 490 miles (about 790 km) over Siberia, creating over 1,000 pieces of space debris.
Kessler, the creator of what is known as the Kessler Syndrome, believes that an increasing frequency of collision of space junk will create "a permanent belt of space debris" that would be so thick that it would be a hazard to any attempted launched rocket or satellite.
Two current possible ideas for cleaning up space debris are the use of powerful lasers, whose projected laser beams would push the space junk into lower orbits to be burnt up, and the creation of a matrix of nets to catch some of the space junk.
Kessler, however, thinks that neither concept would be a total solution, even if they worked as planned.
Numerous companies in North America are working on various space junk clean-up projects. One such company is the Star Technology and Research (STAR) in Mount Pleasant, South Carolina.
STAR is the recent recipient of nearly 2 million U.S. dollars from NASA to create a spacecraft called ElctroDynamic Debris Eliminator (EDDE).
If successfully made and operated, EDDE would target non-functioning orbiting satellites that weigh one ton apiece.
"EDDE will sail on the Earth's magnetic field like a sailing ship in the wind, giving it unlimited range, using solar power. This is the breakthrough technology that makes possible the removal of all large, dangerous debris objects in low Earth orbit. We are working to develop the components that make EDDE possible," STAR spokesman Jerome Pearson told Xinhua.
According to the design, EDDE would sail to an extinct satellite, using a solar-powered six-mile long space tether line. It will then eject a large net to catch the targeted satellite, and lower itself into a lower orbit. It will fire out the caught satellite into the Earth`s atmosphere, where it would then burn up.
Once EDDE ejects the satellite, it will "sail" back up into higher orbit and proceed to catch another non-operating satellite, Pearson explained.
There are more than 2,000 tons of debris in low Earth orbit, below the 2,000-kilometer altitude. EDDE could catch and dispose of the larger "dead" space satellites, Pearson said.
But the main current threat to operational satellites and to the astronauts on the International Space Station is the untracked shrapnel between one and ten centimeters in size, he said.
"They are too small to track with current means, but they are large enough to destroy a satellite or puncture an ISS module."
Pearson said the entire international satellite launch community should logically share in the burden of cleaning up space debris.
NASA's current policies on space debris were called into question by a report released last September by the National Research Council, an affiliate of the Academy of Sciences.
"NASA should collaborate with commercial, national, and international agencies to develop more explicit information about the costs of debris avoidance, mitigation, surveillance, and response. With this information, NASA could develop a more detailed plan for long-term issues," said the report.
(I025/H-AK)
Editor: Ade P Marboen
Copyright © ANTARA 2012
